Stories that begin with the words, “You couldn’t make this up,” abound, I know.  But this one has that extra something: swanism. 

It began when a gentleman whose home overlooked West Shore boating pool in the seaside town of Llandudno, North Wales looked out of his window and:-

saw Miah, a former restaurant owner who came to Britain from Bangladesh 40 years ago, rolling around on the grass with the swan’s wing on the ground next to him.

The alarmed gentleman called the police who duly arrived to find 52-year-old Shamshu Miah with blood on his clothes and feathers in his beard.

They confronted Bangladeshi-born Miah, who told the police: “I am a Muslim, I am fasting, I had to eat.

“I was hungry, I had to eat the swan. I killed it, I stabbed it.

“I did nothing wrong, it was just a bird, I needed to eat.”

It is forbidden for Muslims to eat during daylight hours over the Islamic month of Ramadan.

One of the officers told Miah it was illegal to kill a swan because it was the property of the Queen, to which Miah replied: “I hate the Queen, I hate this country.”

Psychiatric reports indicated Miah was not mentally ill at the time of the attack.  But we must be, to abide with Miah for 40 years.

Reporting on a scientific “discovery” “published simultaneously in three leading science journals by scientists from 13 different research centres in Britain and America” The UK Independent Online reports that:

The findings mean that instead of humanity being 99.9 per cent identical, as previously believed, we are at least 10 times more different between one another than once thought…

So, let’s try to be rational about this:  Since the 1960s, the so called “authorities” have been telling young coeds in their college classes that their choice of mates among males genetically distant from them (let’s take for example, many of the “authorities” themselves, like Lewontin) was of little consequence because in addition to there being “no such thing as race”, the genetic distance between humans was disappearingly small.  This during the largest waste of potential fertility among women of European ancestry in history and the most intense campaign of propaganda to encourage outbreeding choices among those women by virtually all leaders of media and academia—among those who stood to benefit reproductively by this propaganda during an era of emerging de facto polygyny (misnamed by those same “authorities” as “serial monogamy”).

Rape, including passive participation in gang-rape, does deserve the death penalty and this does qualify as massive gang-rape-by-fraud.

No, I don’t believe for a moment that it would have taken this long for this information to come forth if the media and academia “authorities” had not been as distantly related to their victims, aka “students”.

Yes, genetic advances have forced the issue somewhat but the real driver here is the fact that technologically amplified mixing of populations has gotten so far out of hand that the former ersatz “authorities” are trying to back peddle now that they’re finding themselves suffering from the kind of genocide they once could impose on us with impunity.

I just did a spot of that, and came up with this - at no.4 in a list of 159,000:-

MajorityRights.com: A site for the discussion of issues affecting ...
Alon Ziv has to be insane if he believes that the broad-nosed and masculine mixed-race woman looks better. The average American white woman, shown above and ...
majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/C45/ - 60k - 20 Nov 2006 - Cached - Similar pages

“Insane” ... “broad-nosed and masculine mixed-race women” ...  You see, you can get your POV out there.  AND nullify the outrageous racism of our opponents.

Apologies, btw, to the two Alon Zivs above us who are, respectively, in the geology and computer science fields.  No apologies, obviously, to the man who encourages us to bed a Bantu.

One of the toughest nuts for WN in America to crack is the pervasive and powerful idea of cultural assimilation.  The tenacity with which Euro-Americans cling to the myth was demostrated conclusively today in Quinnipiac University’s nationwide poll of US voter attitudes on illegal immigration.

By a 69 - 27 percent margin, American voters say illegal immigrants should be allowed into a guest worker program with the ability to work toward citizenship over a period of several years, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.

Republicans support the guest worker to citizenship path 66 - 31 percent, while Democrats back it 73 - 23 percent and independent voters back it 71 - 24 percent

It’s not that voters don’t understand the invasive nature of Mexican immigration:-

Building a 700-mile fence on the U.S.-Mexican border is “enough for now,” 24 percent of voters say, but 71 percent say, “additional measures are needed from Congress to deal with illegal immigrants entering the country.”

... but once in the country the illegal has it all his own way.  It’s interesting that sentiment against his employers, as expressed to the pollsters, runs strong.  But the illegal himself is surrounded by some golden haze of mythic Americana.  He is placed beyond punishment.

Looking at the subsidiary matters resolved in Arizona last week it is clear that actual experience of illegal Mexican immigrants produces a concrete change in attitude.  But further afield, none of that counts for anything and the myth of assimilated America conquers all.

Steve Jones, the professional professorial race-denier and friend to snails in and out of the Labour Party, has been guiding the insufficiently universalist Telegraph reader away from harmful thoughts.

Stevie-baby is an interesting case.  All through his career he has exemplified the triumph of leftist politics over scientific integrity.  But as the haplotype blocks relinquish their secrets it is becoming much harder for him to operate.  These days he mostly confines himself to soft targets.

He first came to my attention in the late 1990s when BBC Radio 4’s “Today”, always keen for a bit of white-race baiting, regularly turned to him for expert wiseacreage.  He was just required to mouth a few pieties, condemn racism and genetic determinism and kill off all complaint with a few forbidding words like “chromosome” and “mytochondrial”.  The listening audience, presumably floored, was left to embrace the nearest wonderful human being in any skin colour but white.

It’s strange how memory dances around the detail, but I remember one “Today” interview from the late 1990s involving Jones the Gene and an expert, unusually, from the other side of the argument.  The subject was the then-imminent effort to crack the human genome.  I heard the broadcast while on the return leg of the morning school run.  I can remember being caught in traffic in Seaford at the time - not an intellectually stimulating environment.  But I was certainly stimulated when Our Steve’s opponent, whose name I do not recall, caught him cold with a straight right, “The race debate is over,” he said, “Our side is proved to have been right all along.”

READ MORE...

If you were among the unfortunate many who gave your money to Sacha Baron Cohen to see “Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan”, and now you feel like you have been somehow violated in a most unseemly manner, may I suggest you try an antidote:

“The Long Way Round” video series, wherein Ewan McGregor and Charlie Boorman attempt, somewhat successfully, to lose their pampered show business selves on the road around the world.  Well around the northern reaches of the world. 

They travel around the world on two BMW’s (with a support crew, of course—I did say “somewhat successfully”) through, among other nations, Kazakhstan, where they actually meet and dine with real Kazakhs. 

Its something of a pleasure to see these two engage in an attempt to purify themselves of their Hollywood culture.  They are reasonably successful given their limitations although one can’t help thinking of Charlie Boorman’s father’s obscene depiction of the Scotch Irish in “Deliverance” and wonder what in the world possessed him to make such a piece of ethnic slander against those with whom he is related.

The Dutch government agreed today on:-

a total ban on the wearing of burqas and other Muslim face veils in public, justifying the move on security grounds.

Immigration Minister Rita Verdonk will now draw up legislation which will result in the Netherlands, once one of Europe’s most easy-going nations, imposing some of the continent’s toughest laws against concealing the face.

“The cabinet finds it undesirable that garments covering the face—including the burqa—should be worn in public in view of public order, (and) the security and protection of fellow citizens,” the Dutch Justice Ministry said in a statement.

Well, is this a step towards saving Holland or sealing its fate?

The answer varies according to which you place uppermost: Dutch national interest or Dutch ethnic interest.  Those who like the novelty of forcing Moslems to stay on Dutch terms or go wear their burqas someplace else should listen closely to the Mayor of Amsterdam:-

Job Cohen, the Labour mayor of Amsterdam, said he opposed burqas in schools and public buildings, and said women wearing one who failed to get a job should not expect welfare benefits.

“From the perspective of integration and communication, it is obviously very bad because you can’t see each other so the fewer the better,” he told foreign journalists.  “But actually hardly anybody wears one ...  The fuss is much bigger than the number of people concerned.”

It’s easy to be tough about a palliative.  Dutch national interest is the interest of the polital and cultural elite.  They want a successful integration.  They do NOT want - and will not get - a tented city of defeated burqa-wearers at the Algerian Airlines check-in.  But they will get the support of all those Dutch indigenes who believe Geert Wilders to be a “far-right politician”, and wouldn’t know their ethnic interest from a well fattened goat.

A burqa ban is a politically shrewd strategy from a mainstream liberal perspective.

None-too-bright but seemingly unstoppable lip-flapper and scourge of English survivalism ... “The Man” when it comes to equality ... the one and only Trevor Phillips, Tony’s Georgetown bro, has been laying those smooth, smooth moves on the BNP.  Again.

Church should expel racists and BNP supporters, says CRE chief

Churches should expel racists and supporters of the British National Party from their pews, the head of the Government’s race watchdog said today.

Trevor Phillips called on bishop and priests to refuse communion to racists and turn them into “pariahs and outsiders”.

“Will the churches support any priest or minister who says I will not administer the sacrament to someone who blatantly rejects Christ’s teachings?”

... The CRE chief said at a conference run by the Evangelical Alliance, a grouping that includes many of the country’s black churches, that the churches should have condemned the BNP leader.

“If ever there was a moment for hellfire and damnation, this was it,” Mr Phillips said. “At the very least, every pulpit this Sunday should have been ringing with denunciation, ministers and priests crying ‘not in our name’.

“The far right should not be able to claim Christ to their cause. But they will do if we let them.”

He added: “I feel rage that my church might expect me to be in communion with such as Nick Griffin.  This is where Christ puts us to the test.

“In the end it is Christians who decide who shares their fellowship, and who is excluded.”

Mr Phillips asked: “Are we ready to use weapons of faith to turn these people into pariahs and outsiders?”

READ MORE...